Showing educator reviews. Choose “All reviews” below to return to the combined community view.
Firsthand experience
Reviews
EagleteachEducator review · Classroom teacher
4/5Content
3/5Usability
4/5Engagement
2/5Student support
2/5Extra prep (lower prep is better)
The lessons are solid but the pacing is too fast. A lot of supplemental activities needed. Assessments are excellent but do not align with daily curriculum provided.
I appreciate both the workbook and ebook editions.
Full rating summary
4/5Content effectiveness
3/5Clear & practical
4/5Grade appropriate
4/5Engagement
2/5Practice & activities
2/5Data & support
2/5Readiness support
2/5Realistic time
2/5Extra prep (lower prep is better)
3/5Recommend
Reviewer context & implementation details
Taught or facilitated with the product · 6–8 · Two to three school years · Some training (one introductory session)
HMH MS Science curriculum aims to prepare students to demonstrate understanding of the content at a high level of mastery. The assessments are excellent and provide many questions that require students to apply their learning in new ways. However, the daily curriculum and support materials fall very short in scaffolding students learning to prepare them for the assessments. Teachers need to develop the scaffolding needed to help students arrive at the level of mastery needed for the assessments, which takes additional time preparing materials. Most students will not be successful on the assessments if only the HMH provided materials are used.
HMH does provide both print and online access to all of their provided materials which is helpful. The consumable textbooks (workbooks) are a nice resource for students to engage with as they are learning.
Full rating summary
3/5Content effectiveness
3/5Clear & practical
3/5Grade appropriate
3/5Engagement
2/5Practice & activities
4/5Data & support
3/5Readiness support
4/5Realistic time
3/5Extra prep (lower prep is better)
3/5Recommend
Reviewer context & implementation details
Taught or facilitated with the product · 6–8 · Two to three school years · Some training (one introductory session) · State-adapted or standards-aligned edition · Science · Faith-based school · Under 300 learners · Suburban · General / mixed classrooms
Was this review helpful?
Read responses
No approved responses yet.
Science77Educator review · School or district leader
3/5Content
4/5Usability
3/5Engagement
4/5Student support
1/5Extra prep (lower prep is better)
Overall, there were both strengths and weaknesses of the materials. I appreciated the student worktext and ebook. They were engaging and offered lots of discussion questions, prompts, and labs. The assessments were phenomenal — well aligned with the standards and challenging.
There are two big issues I have with the program. 1) There was a severe lack of study/learning materials. I had to create a lot of "practice worksheets" to reinforce the concepts or use other learning programs. The program just moved too fast in that regard. 2) the instructional materials (worktext/ebook, presentations) were not at all aligned with the assessments. The assessments asked high-rigor questions that the ebook and presentations did not prepare students for. I had to find creative ways to build in those types of questions to my lesson which took a lot of time. I think the program is good, but improving those two things would be helpful.
Full rating summary
3/5Content effectiveness
4/5Clear & practical
4/5Grade appropriate
3/5Engagement
2/5Practice & activities
4/5Data & support
3/5Readiness support
4/5Realistic time
1/5Extra prep (lower prep is better)
3/5Recommend
Reviewer context & implementation details
Taught or facilitated with the product, Supported implementation or training, Evaluated or selected the product · 6–8 · Two to three school years · Ongoing support and coaching · Science · Faith-based school · 300–699 learners · Mixed / varied setting · General / mixed classrooms
2 educators found this helpful
Read responses (2)
Academics8/7/2026
What types of other resources, like studying/learning, did you use to supplement the curriculum? Did you create them all yourself or find them from somewhere else? Thanks.
Science778/7/2026
Sometimes I just use AI to create worksheets. For example, I'll download my presentation and upload it to Gemini or ChatGPT and tell it to create a practice worksheet with m/c and open response questions for a certain slide or series of slides, or another form of activity. I'll also create something from scratch if needed. Wayground is also good for generating practice questions. Either way, it takes a lot of time to do this for every lesson.
Educator exchange
Questions & ideas
Ask about the product or share a practical idea. This moderated exchange is separate from reviews and never affects the product rating.
No approved questions or ideas yet.Considering the program or have a useful implementation thought? Start the exchange—no direct-use review is required.