← All products

IXL Learning

IXL Science

Science skills practice — Biology • Chemistry • Physics • Earth Science — curriculum

Company Website ↗
2approved reviews
2educator reviews
0parent reviews
4.7/5educator overall
5.0/5educator recommend

Educator and parent reviews appear together below. Filter by audience to compare experiences without blending their different questionnaires.

EagleteachEducator review · Classroom teacher
5/5Content
5/5Usability
4/5Engagement
4/5Student support
5/5Extra prep (lower prep is better)

IXL skills are scaffolded to help build student knowledge. It is great supplemental practice (homework)

Full rating summary
5/5Content effectiveness
5/5Clear & practical
4/5Grade appropriate
4/5Engagement
5/5Practice & activities
4/5Data & support
4/5Readiness support
4/5Realistic time
5/5Extra prep (lower prep is better)
5/5Recommend
Reviewer context & implementation details

Taught or facilitated with the product · 6–8 · Two to three school years · Some training (one introductory session) · National or current edition

Was this review helpful?
Read responses

No approved responses yet.

AcademicsEducator review · Classroom teacher
5/5Content
5/5Usability
4/5Engagement
5/5Student support
5/5Extra prep (lower prep is better)

I have used IXL as a practice resource for my middle school science classes for the last few years. I have really enjoyed the program and the range of questions it asks students, and it covers pretty much all of the topics in my curriculum. The scenarios in the questions are really good as well. I use it as a guided practice activity during class and for homework. The main complaint from students is that it makes them work toward a proficiency level — if they don't reach it, they have to start over on that session. I wish there were a different way for students to work towards completion of a certain skill at a given time. I get the idea of proficiency, but it's not practical when students are trying to complete it within a certain timeframe (like for homework). Also, I wish it would flag rapid guessing. Some students tear through it just to get it done, and they are obviously not learning anything. Overall, I think the program is great, and I would recommend it to other science teachers.

Full rating summary
5/5Content effectiveness
5/5Clear & practical
5/5Grade appropriate
4/5Engagement
5/5Practice & activities
5/5Data & support
5/5Readiness support
5/5Realistic time
5/5Extra prep (lower prep is better)
5/5Recommend
Reviewer context & implementation details

Taught or facilitated with the product, Supported implementation or training · 6–8 · Two to three school years · Ongoing support and coaching · Science · Faith-based school · 300–699 learners · Mixed / varied setting · Varied learner needs

Was this review helpful?
Read responses

No approved responses yet.

Educator exchange

Questions & ideas

Ask about the product or share a practical idea. This moderated exchange is separate from reviews and never affects the product rating.

No approved questions or ideas yet.Considering the program or have a useful implementation thought? Start the exchange—no direct-use review is required.